Abstract
In the above letter, Chin and Chen proposed an IEEE 1588 clock synchronization method based on dual slave clocks, where they claim that multiple unknown parameters - i.e., clock offset, clock skew, and master-to-slave delay - can be estimated with only one-way time transfers using more equations than usual. This comment investigates Chin and Chen's dual clock scheme with detailed models for a master and dual slave clocks and shows that the formulation of multi-parameter estimation is invalid, which affirms that it is impossible to distinguish the effect of delay from that of clock offset at a slave even with dual slave clocks.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 6799190 |
| Pages (from-to) | 981-982 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | IEEE Communications Letters |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Clock synchronization
- clock offset
- clock skew
- path delay
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comments on 'IEEE 1588 clock synchronization using dual slave clocks in a slave''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver