Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Coleridge and the Idea of History

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Coleridge spoke in September 1831 of his wish ‘to make History scientific, and Science historical – to take from History its accidentality – and from Science its fatalism’. This self-description raises the question of Coleridge’s status as a ‘scientific historian’. Is Coleridge a prototype for R.G. Collingwood’s definition of this mode of scientific study, of solving problems, not surveying periods, putting questions to ‘the world of ideas’ which historical evidence ‘creates in the present’? Is Coleridge, alternatively, the pattern of Collingwood’s deluded ‘pigeon-holer’, arranging the past ‘in a single scheme’ and bragging about ‘raising history to the rank of a science’. Re-reading Coleridge with Collingwood and twenty-first century accounts of historical idealism and of ‘presence’, I trace a distinct historical interest back through Church and State (1829), The Friend (1818) and Biographia Literaria (1817) to the ‘Comparison’ essays of 1802.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)42-55
    Number of pages14
    JournalRomanticism
    Volume29
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2023

    Keywords

    • Burke
    • Coleridge
    • Collingwood
    • facts
    • interpretation
    • method
    • progress

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Coleridge and the Idea of History'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this