Abstract
Somalia has become a front in the US Global War on Terror (GWoT) because of the potential connection between terrorism and state fragility. While originally oriented towards ‘building states while fighting terror’, Enduring Freedom in Somalia obtained quite the opposite result of deepening the existing conflict. Why and how did the GWoT result in the controversial outcome of ‘building terror while fighting enemies’? This article argues that the GWoT sponsored in Somalia an isolationist strategy that encouraged the political polarisation and military radicalisation of the insurgency. To explore this argument, the article first analyses the structure of the intervention by focusing on the interests and strategies of the interveners. Then it evaluates the conditions under which the modality of intervention (through the use of diplomatic, economic and coercive measures) violated the conditions essential to resolving conflict.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1866-1886 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Third World Quarterly |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Oct 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Global War on Terror
- Somalia
- military intervention
- radicalisation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Building terror while fighting enemies: how the Global War on Terror deepened the crisis in Somalia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver