Bringing the founders back in: How does prosocial motivation affect social enterprises’ organizational legitimacy?

  • Yingzhao Xiao*
  • , Anna J. C. Hsu
  • , Kevin Au
  • , Zhen Liu
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Compared to institutional factors, prosocial motivation is arguably the most salient founder attribute held as a determinant of social enterprise (SE) legitimacy. Yet the process and the explanation remain unclear. We propose a mechanism involving resource bricolage as a mediator and social class as a boundary condition. Three studies with different stakeholders test a moderated mediation model regarding the mechanism: (1) a survey of 210 social entrepreneurs, (2) a measurement-as-mediation experiment with 203 public servants, and (3) a manipulation-as-mediation experiment with 630 potential consumers. The results reveal that resource bricolage explains why prosocial motivation is of importance in gaining legitimacy for SEs. Moreover, the effect of prosocial motivation on SEs’ legitimacy through resource bricolage is salient for social entrepreneurs from a higher social class but intriguingly not for those from a lower social class. Our findings contribute to the literatures on social entrepreneurship and business ethics in general.
Original languageEnglish
Article number115837
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume204
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Keywords

  • Organizational legitimacy
  • Prosocial motivation
  • Resource bricolage
  • Social class
  • Social enterprises

Cite this