Abstract
This study examines the reaction of Korean banks’ procyclical behaviour to the adoption of the Basel III accord, which imposes a global capital framework on banks, and the sensitivity of Korean banks’ reactions depending on their capital structures prior to the adoption of the accord. Employing the random-effects panel data approach, we find that the procyclicality of banks, in terms of the capital adequacy ratio, profitability, and insolvency risk, is mitigated after the adoption of the accord. This change is only evident for banks with low capital adequacy ratios before the regulatory reform. Our findings suggest that the Basel III accord effectively mitigates bank procyclicality and that banks’ sensitivity to the reform becomes greater when their capital adequacy ratios are lower. The policy implications of the adoption in emerging and transitional economies are discussed, given the heterogeneous reaction of Korean banks to the international regulatory reform.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 149-162 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Investment Analysts Journal |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Apr 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Bank sensitivity
- Basel III accord
- Korean market
- capital adequacy ratio
- international regulatory reform
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bank sensitivity to international regulatory reform: The case of Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver