Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are households’ residential preferences consistent with biodiversity conservation in different urban contexts?

  • Camille Regnier*
  • , Gengyang Tu
  • , Sophie Legras
  • , Mohamed Hilal
  • , Cécile Détang-Dessendre
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Université Paris-Est Créteil
  • Université Bourgogne-Franche-Comté

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article combines stated preference methods and graph-based landscape approaches to assess the possible synergy existing between households’ residential preferences and biodiversity conservation in urban areas. We start by estimating household’s residential preferences regarding different landscape attributes (i.e. green spaces and compactness of the neighbourhood) of chosen urban contexts applying the choice experiment method. Then, by integrating ecological indicators obtained by using a graph-based approach in our valuation model, we study the impact of the residential choice on biodiversity conservation. Our results suggest that the preferred neighbourhood also have landscape structure that are in favour of biodiversity conservation. The preference heterogeneity for green spaces and compactness will induce landscape-based sorting. Household’s residential location choices affect biodiversity conservation differently which depend on their socio-demographic characteristics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)720-745
Number of pages26
JournalHousing Studies
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jun 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Keywords

  • Green preferences
  • choice experiment
  • landscape graph analysis
  • residential choice
  • urban biodiversity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are households’ residential preferences consistent with biodiversity conservation in different urban contexts?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this