TY - JOUR
T1 - Agency Problem and Corporate Philanthropy—Evidence from China’s Anticorruption Campaign
AU - Liang, Lihong
AU - Liu, Nian
AU - Ma, Wenjie
PY - 2025/7/16
Y1 - 2025/7/16
N2 - This study explores the effect of China’s anticorruption campaign as a natural experiment for testing the agency-cost view of philanthropy. We find that state-owned enterprises (SOEs), which are more influenced by this campaign, experienced larger declines in philanthropy than non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs), especially regarding the percentage of high-agency-cost donations. The effect is more pronounced for firms with higher agency costs, namely firms with higher perks and located in low-legal-protection regions. Further, using manually collected data on firms’ philanthropy disclosure, we find that the campaign improves transparency in corporate philanthropy disclosures. SOEs are more likely to disclose donation information and provide more detailed disclosures than non-SOEs post-campaign. Finally, we find that investors react more positively to SOEs’ philanthropic announcements after the campaign than to non-SOEs’ announcements. Overall, our findings support the agency-cost view of corporate philanthropy, and external monitoring can curb the agency costs associated with such behavior.
AB - This study explores the effect of China’s anticorruption campaign as a natural experiment for testing the agency-cost view of philanthropy. We find that state-owned enterprises (SOEs), which are more influenced by this campaign, experienced larger declines in philanthropy than non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs), especially regarding the percentage of high-agency-cost donations. The effect is more pronounced for firms with higher agency costs, namely firms with higher perks and located in low-legal-protection regions. Further, using manually collected data on firms’ philanthropy disclosure, we find that the campaign improves transparency in corporate philanthropy disclosures. SOEs are more likely to disclose donation information and provide more detailed disclosures than non-SOEs post-campaign. Finally, we find that investors react more positively to SOEs’ philanthropic announcements after the campaign than to non-SOEs’ announcements. Overall, our findings support the agency-cost view of corporate philanthropy, and external monitoring can curb the agency costs associated with such behavior.
M3 - Article
SN - 1542-6297
JO - Journal of International Accounting Research
JF - Journal of International Accounting Research
ER -