Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Aeolian Saltation Flux Profiles: Comparison of Representation and Measurement Methods

  • Douglas J. Sherman
  • , Junsu Bae
  • , Jean T. Ellis
  • , Christy Swann
  • , Eric Parteli
  • , Eugene J. Farrell
  • , Bailiang Li
  • , Ascânio Araújo
  • , Alexandre de Carvalho
  • , Diane Sherman
  • , Pei Zhang*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Alabama
  • University of South Carolina
  • RCOAST Company
  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • University of Galway
  • Universidade Federal do Ceará
  • New Mexico State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wind-blown sand concentrations decay rapidly and in an orderly manner with height above the surface. The saltation flux profiles are of interest to understand wind and sand interactions and for fundamental measurement and modeling of associated transport rates. This study compares methods to measure and represent aeolian sand flux profiles. We measured vertical flux profiles and used quality-controlled data to test power, logarithmic, and exponential functions to reproduce the profiles. These results are used in a pragmatic assessment of the efficiency of reproducing flux profiles from vertically discontinuous arrays of traps or sensors compared to profiles obtained from continuous vertical arrays of segmented traps. Our analysis corroborates previous findings demonstrating that exponential decay functions are statistically the best method to approximate flux profiles. The results are used in a novel application to compare flux profiles reproduced from vertically discontinuous arrays of devices with those obtained from continuous vertical arrays comprising nine mesh-style traps. The results indicate that discontinuous arrays of 3, 4, 5, or 6 devices deployed less than 200 mm from the surface will effectively reproduce results from the continuous array, with average errors less than 3%. Errors increase when devices are at greater heights or as the number of devices decreases. Discontinuous arrays typically do not capture creep transport which would contribute to error in our comparisons. Therefore, creep must comprise less than 3% of total aeolian sand flux, contradicting typical assumptions of 25%.

Original languageEnglish
Article number323
JournalGeosciences (Switzerland)
Volume15
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Aug 2025

Keywords

  • creep transport
  • exponential curve
  • mesh traps
  • transport rates
  • wind-blown sand

Cite this