A global assessment of BirdNET performance: Differences among continents, biomes, and species

  • David Funosas*
  • , Esther Sebastián-González
  • , Jon Morant
  • , Oscar H. Marín Gómez
  • , Irene Mendoza
  • , Miguel A. Mohedano-Muñoz
  • , Eduardo Santamaría
  • , Giulia Bastianelli
  • , Alba Márquez-Rodríguez
  • , Michał Budka
  • , Gerard Bota
  • , Cristina D. Alonso-Moya
  • , José M. de la Peña-Rubio
  • , Eladio L.García de la Morena
  • , Manu Santa-Cruz
  • , Pablo de la Nava
  • , Mario Fernández-Tizón
  • , Hugo Sánchez-Mateos
  • , Adrián Barrero
  • , Juan Traba
  • Tomasz S. Osiejuk, Patrick J. Hart, Amanda K. Navine, Andrés F. Montoya Muñoz, Carlos B. de Araújo, Gabriel L.M. Rosa, Ingrid M.D. Torres, Ana L.C. Catalano, Cassio Rachid Simões, Diego Llusia, Manuel B. Morales, Pablo Acebes, Juan A. Medina, Nicholas Brown, Christos Astaras, Ilias Karmiris, Elizabeth Navarrete, Maxime Cauchoix, Luc Barbaro, Dominik Arend, Sandra Müeller, Fernando González-García, Alberto González-Romero, Christos Mammides, Michaelangelo Pontikis, Giordano Jacuzzi, Julian D. Olden, Sara P. Bombaci, Gabriel Marcacci, Alain Jacot, Juan P. Zurano, Elena Gangenova, Diego Varela, Facundo Di Sallo, Gustavo A. Zurita, Andrey Atemasov, Junior A. Tremblay, Vincent Lamarre, Anja Hutschenreiter, Alan Monroy-Ojeda, Mauricio Díaz-Vallejo, Sergio Chaparro-Herrera, Robert A. Briers, Renata Sousa-Lima, Thiago Pinheiro, Wigna C. Da Silva, Alice Calvente, Raiane V. Paz, Carlos Salustio-Gomes, Dorgival D. Oliveira-Júnior, Cicero S. lima-Santos, Mauro Pichorim, Anamaria Dal Molin, Alexandre Antonelli, Svetlana Gogoleva, Igor Palko, Hiếu V. Trong, Marina H.L. Duarte, Natalia dos Santos Saturnino, Samuel R. Silva, Ana Rainho, Paula Lopes, Karl L. Schuchmann, Marinêz I. Marques, Ana S. de Oliverira Tissiani, Nick A. Littlewood, Mao Ning Tuanmu, Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas, Andrea L. Aguilera, Lluís Brotons, Mariano J. Feldman, Louis Imbeau, Pooja Panwar, Aaron S. Weed, Anant Dehwal, Alfredo Attisano, Jörn Theuerkauf, Eben Goodale, Kevin F.A. Darras, Cristian Pérez-Granados
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recent advances in machine learning have accelerated automated species detection across diverse ecological domains, enabling large-scale, non-invasive monitoring of biodiversity. In ornithological research, the combination of passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) and rapidly-developing novel identification tools such as BirdNET—a deep learning–based sound recognition algorithm—offers new opportunities for surveying vocally active bird communities. Here, we present the first worldwide evaluation of BirdNET using 4224 one-minute recordings from 67 sites across all continents annotated by local experts. More specifically, we assessed the capacity of BirdNET to accurately identify individual vocalizations and characterize bird communities based on the automated analysis of passively collected soundscapes. We further analyzed how its performance varies across continents, biomes, species, and minimum confidence thresholds. The proportion of correct BirdNET predictions (precision) was generally high and consistent across continents (range: 0.57–0.71) and biomes (range: 0.55–0.76). In contrast, the proportion of vocalizations successfully detected (recall) was generally lower and more heterogeneous across continents (range: 0.24–0.52) and biomes (range: 0.34–0.72), reflecting differences in species coverage and local ecological context. BirdNET predictive power, as measured by the Precision-Recall Area Under the Curve (PR AUC; higher values indicating better performance), was highest in North America, Oceania, and Europe (range: 0.16–0.23), moderate in Central/South America (0.13), and lowest in Africa and Asia (range: 0.03–0.04). Species-specific analyses revealed substantial heterogeneity in detection accuracy, with optimal confidence thresholds varying widely by species and analytical goal. Our results establish a global reference point for BirdNET reliability and highlight where algorithmic refinement and expanded acoustic sampling are most needed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114550
JournalEcological Indicators
Volume182
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2026

Keywords

  • Automated detection
  • Bird communities
  • BirdNET
  • Confidence threshold
  • Deep learning
  • Passive acoustic monitoring

Cite this