TY - JOUR
T1 - A Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience Improves Outcomes in Mentored Research
AU - Fendos, Justin
AU - Cai, Liang
AU - Yang, Xianmei
AU - Ren, Guodong
AU - Li, Lin
AU - Yan, Zhiqiang
AU - Lu, Boxun
AU - Pi, Yan
AU - Ma, Jinbiao
AU - Guo, Bin
AU - Wu, Xiaohui
AU - Lu, Pingli
AU - Zhang, Ruilin
AU - Yang, Ji
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 J. Fendos et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2022 The American Society for Cell Biology.
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - Infusing undergraduate curricula with authentic research training is an important con-temporary challenge. Such exposure typically occurs through mentored research (MR) or course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs). In Asian contexts, CURE implementation is rare, while MR is often a graduation requirement. In this study, mentor interviews and mentee focus groups were used to characterize the learning challenges associated with this requirement at a Chinese university. An intensive 6-week CURE was then implemented as an MR preparatory program to help mitigate the identified challenges. This program contained seven site-specific features not typically included in other CUREs, each designed to improve different aspects of student readiness for MR. Post-CURE sur-veys, focus groups, and interviews demonstrated CURE enrollment significantly improved subsequent MR outcomes. Almost 90% of all enrollees, for example, began their first MR experience in their second year, more than twice the rate of non-enrollees. Enrollees also reported greater confidence in their research skills and more frequent experiences working in multiple labs. This study reports both immediate CURE and downstream MR outcomes, using the former to help explain the latter. A comprehensive CURE implementation process is described, offering a potential model for the design of other programs with similar research enhancement goals.
AB - Infusing undergraduate curricula with authentic research training is an important con-temporary challenge. Such exposure typically occurs through mentored research (MR) or course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs). In Asian contexts, CURE implementation is rare, while MR is often a graduation requirement. In this study, mentor interviews and mentee focus groups were used to characterize the learning challenges associated with this requirement at a Chinese university. An intensive 6-week CURE was then implemented as an MR preparatory program to help mitigate the identified challenges. This program contained seven site-specific features not typically included in other CUREs, each designed to improve different aspects of student readiness for MR. Post-CURE sur-veys, focus groups, and interviews demonstrated CURE enrollment significantly improved subsequent MR outcomes. Almost 90% of all enrollees, for example, began their first MR experience in their second year, more than twice the rate of non-enrollees. Enrollees also reported greater confidence in their research skills and more frequent experiences working in multiple labs. This study reports both immediate CURE and downstream MR outcomes, using the former to help explain the latter. A comprehensive CURE implementation process is described, offering a potential model for the design of other programs with similar research enhancement goals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134345958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1187/cbe.21-03-0065
DO - 10.1187/cbe.21-03-0065
M3 - Article
C2 - 35833940
AN - SCOPUS:85134345958
SN - 1931-7913
VL - 21
JO - CBE Life Sciences Education
JF - CBE Life Sciences Education
IS - 3
M1 - ar49
ER -